The lawsuit comes two years after President Vladimir Putin began a campaign to reign in dissent at home – targeting NGOs with international ties, human rights activists and political opponents.
The lawsuit comes two years after President Vladimir Putin began a campaign to reign in dissent at home – targeting NGOs with international ties, human rights activists and political opponents.
Neither celebrity pols like Hillary Clinton nor economic alliances like the European Union are likely to sway the Kremlin from pursuing its current course.
Critics of the American president’s foreign policy see the Ukraine debacle as the inevitable result of an approach that assumes rationality on part of other powers.
From reports of naval ship movements to talk of issuing passports to sympathetic Ukrainians, the latest on Russia’s response.
The specter of Russian domination grows with the latest gossip from the Kremlin, which suggests an attempt at territorial annexation is not off the table.
From gays to corruption and security concerns, what once looked like an obvious propaganda boost for his government is now shaping up to be a political minefield.
Though he seemed to be reassuring international athletes, the Russian president may have been encouraging violence against his own citizens.
An existential threat to his core political identity as a strongman protector of the Russian public, the re-emergence of Islamic insurgents poses international problems as well.
Afraid of paying an economic price for close ties with the European Union, Ukraine is now serving as an international PR booster for Vladimir Putin as it considers employing his tactics on outraged opposition.
The authoritarian Russian president, not exactly known for his democratic values, can withstand any blowback for what appears to be mass espionage.